The essentials of this article
  • What is a vertebral compression fracture from osteoporosis?
  • What are the symptoms of a vertebral fracture from osteoporosis?
  • How is a vertebral compression fracture treated?
  • When is vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty indicated?
  • What are vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty?

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture — more frequent than hip or wrist fractures — and yet remain widely underdiagnosed because many produce no obvious symptoms. This article answers the 11 questions patients ask most, backed by current evidence.

Had spine surgery and the pain returned? Send your studies for a second opinion.

Send my studies

A vertebral compression fracture occurs when a vertebra — weakened by the bone density loss characteristic of osteoporosis — collapses or is crushed. It can occur with minimal force: coughing, bending over, or even without an identifiable trigger.

Key fact

Vertebral compression fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture — more frequent than hip or wrist fractures. They most often affect the mid-to-lower thoracic spine and the upper lumbar spine.

Alsoof D et al., Am J Med 2022 · ref. 9

The classic presentation is sudden, localized back pain that worsens when standing or sitting and improves when lying down. Up to two-thirds of these fractures cause no obvious symptoms and are discovered incidentally.

Signs that warrant evaluation
  • Sudden back pain after a minor movement or with no clear cause
  • Pain that worsens when standing and improves when lying down
  • Progressive height loss or a noticeable forward curvature
  • Known osteoporosis or risk factors — menopause, chronic steroid use, prior fracture
Alsoof D et al., Am J Med 2022 · ref. 9

Most fractures are initially managed conservatively: pain medication, bracing, and physical therapy. A meaningful percentage of patients don't improve despite optimal treatment — for them, vertebral augmentation may be considered.

Langner S, Henker C, Radiologe 2020 · ref. 3

Vertebral augmentation is considered when specific criteria are met after an adequate trial of conservative treatment — it is not the first step.

Generally accepted indications
  • Persistent, disabling pain after 2 to 6 weeks of adequate conservative treatment
  • Fracture confirmed on imaging with bone marrow edema on MRI that correlates with the pain
  • Significant functional limitation — inability to stand or walk due to pain
  • Painful fractures from spinal malignancy — myeloma or metastasis, for palliative purposes
  • Progressive vertebral collapse despite bracing, with risk of worsening deformity
Important caveat

Not every fracture visible on imaging needs treatment. A fracture without edema on MRI is usually old and already consolidated — treating it will not relieve pain from a different source.

Alsoof D et al., Am J Med 2022 · ref. 9 · Filippiadis DK et al., Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017 · ref. 10
Who is not a candidate
  • Asymptomatic fractures — an incidental finding with no pain is not treated with cement
  • Active infection, local or systemic, at the time of the procedure
  • Uncorrected coagulation disorders or anticoagulation that cannot be safely paused
  • Known allergy to bone cement (PMMA) or its components
  • Neurological compression symptoms — radiculopathy or cord involvement at the fracture level
  • Burst fractures with posterior wall disruption or bone fragments compressing neural structures
Prather H et al., Vertebroplasty, PMC3773069 · Kim DH et al., Med Sci Monit review

Both are percutaneous, minimally invasive procedures that inject bone cement into the fractured vertebra to stabilize it and relieve pain. The difference lies in one additional step.

How fast does pain relief happen?
First 24 hours

About 90% of patients report significant pain relief and improved mobility within the first 24 hours — the cement stabilizes the fracture almost immediately.

First weeks

Published success rates for pain reduction range from 70% to 92%. One comparative study found that treated patients achieved significant relief at a median of 4.5 weeks, versus 10 weeks with conservative treatment alone.

Long term

Relief is generally durable, lasting months to years in responding patients. It is not guaranteed to be permanent for everyone, and it does not treat the underlying osteoporosis — that requires a separate conversation with your doctor.

Chandra RV et al., AJNR 2018 · ref. 6 · Improvingpain.com clinical review · Retrospective cohort, PMC10656983
Vertebroplasty
Kyphoplasty
Procedure
Cement injected directly into the vertebra
A balloon is inflated before injecting cement
Height restoration
Minimal to none
Partial restoration is possible
Cement leakage (mostly asymptomatic)
~55% (range 41–88% depending on the study)
~18–50% — consistently lower in meta-analyses
Symptomatic complications
Rare — ~95% of leaks are clinically silent
Rare, and generally less common
Time / cost
Shorter procedure; usually the more economical option
Longer procedure; the balloon tends to increase cost
Key BM et al., Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021 · ref. 2 · Filippiadis DK et al., Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017 · ref. 10
What happens if the cement leaks?

About 95% of leaks are clinically silent and require no treatment. When it does become symptomatic, it's usually because cement enters a vein toward the lungs (cement pulmonary embolism, ~0.1–1.7% of cases) or, rarely, the spinal canal, requiring urgent surgery. This is why the procedure must be done under continuous imaging guidance by an experienced surgeon.

Oregon HERC evidence report · Zhang J et al., meta-analysis, PubMed 28192270

This is one of the most studied questions in spine intervention. For pain relief, meta-analyses find no significant differences between techniques. Where they do consistently diverge is safety and structural outcome.

What the meta-analyses show
Pain relief: equivalent between both techniques. Cement leakage: kyphoplasty consistently shows a lower rate. Height restoration: kyphoplasty achieves greater restoration. New fractures: most studies find no significant difference between techniques.
Daher M et al., World Neurosurg 2023 · ref. 5 · Gu CN et al., J Neurointerv Surg 2016 · ref. 13 · Yuan WH et al., Medicine 2016 · ref. 12

The concern is biomechanical: cement makes the treated vertebra stiffer, which could theoretically increase stress on adjacent vertebrae. Large meta-analyses have not found a significant, consistent increase attributable to the procedure.

What this means for the patient

Having a vertebral fracture from osteoporosis is associated with roughly a 5-fold increase in the risk of a subsequent fracture, because it signals the bone has already become fragile. This is why treating the osteoporosis itself — with bone density evaluation and medical treatment — is just as important as treating the fracture.

Zhang H et al., Pain Physician 2017 · ref. 21 · Medscape review, "5-fold increase" — emedicine.medscape.com/article/1835633

Systematic reviews comparing both approaches generally find similar pain relief and functional outcomes. The unilateral approach is associated with shorter procedure time, less radiation, and lower cost, without a clear disadvantage when performed with proper technique.

Tan G et al., Medicine 2018 · ref. 17 · Chen X et al., Pain Physician 2018 · ref. 18

Evidence suggests that augmentation performed earlier — generally within the first weeks, after a failed trial of conservative treatment — is associated with better outcomes than delayed intervention. Waiting too long can allow the pain to become chronic and reduce achievable height restoration.

Liu D et al., Pain Physician 2023 · ref. 20

Yes. They are also established palliative options for fractures from metastatic spinal disease or multiple myeloma, where the goal is rapid pain relief. Case selection and coordination with oncologic treatment are essential.

Sørensen ST et al., Spine J 2019 · ref. 7 · Sadeghi-Naini M et al., Clin Spine Surg 2018 · ref. 8

There is no single answer for every fracture. The decision weighs the age of the fracture, the degree of vertebral collapse, whether pain responded to conservative treatment, overall bone health, and whether the fracture is osteoporotic or malignancy-related. The technique is tailored to the case, not applied uniformly.

Gray WK et al., Arch Osteoporos 2022 · ref. 11 · Savage JW et al., J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014 · ref. 14

Not every fracture needs a needle — but persistent pain deserves an answer.

Most fractures heal with conservative treatment alone. When pain doesn't respond within a reasonable timeframe, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty offer a well-studied path to relief — with the choice guided by the case, not a one-size-fits-all protocol.

Every case at CICOVE is evaluated individually — not by protocol.

Dr. Rodrigo Ávila Cervantes
Spine Neurosurgeon · FAANS · FCNS · CICOVE Director