Low back pain & sciatica: when to see a specialist.
Up to 80% of people will have back pain at some point. About 10% of those cases hide something more serious. This guide helps you recognize which is which.
●Reviewed May 2026By Dr. Rodrigo Ávila CervantesSpine Neurosurgeon · FAANS · FCNS~5 min read
Quick answer
Low back pain or sciatica — what's the difference?
Low back pain A location, not a diagnosis Any pain in the lower back and gluteal region, regardless of cause. It's a symptom that can come from many sources — muscle, ligament, disc, joint, vertebra. Sciatica A specific nerve syndrome Pain — sometimes with numbness or tingling — that radiates down the lateral or posterior thigh, sometimes to the foot.
The essentials of this article
Low back pain or sciatica — what's the difference?
Is it normal to have back pain?
What are the main risk factors?
When should I see a spine specialist?
The 9 red flags — what they are, why they matter
Low back pain and sciatica are not synonyms — but most of us use them interchangeably and know roughly where they hurt. They mean different things clinically, and that difference matters. This is the article I'd ask any patient to read before our first appointment: the basics, the red flags, and when you genuinely need a specialist.
Had spine surgery and the pain returned? Send your studies for a second opinion.
Any pain in the lower back and gluteal region, regardless of cause. It's a symptom that can come from many sources — muscle, ligament, disc, joint, vertebra.
Sciatica
A specific nerve syndrome
Pain — sometimes with numbness or tingling — that radiates down the lateral or posterior thigh, sometimes to the foot. It is caused by compression of the sciatic nerve or its roots.
The clinical distinction matters because the management is different. Generic low back pain usually responds to conservative care: activity modification, directed physical therapy, time. Sciatica — because it points to a compressed nerve — needs to know why the nerve is compressed. The two most common causes of sciatica are lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis, and they have very different treatments.
A current primary-care review puts it cleanly: sciatica diagnosis is built on careful history and physical examination, and imaging is usually not necessary at first. Management is escalated stepwise — physical conditioning and proper pain management first; epidural injections or radiofrequency as a second line; surgery as a last resort. The goal is the minimum intervention that resolves the problem, not the maximum.
No — but it is extremely common. Up to 80% of the population will experience low back pain at some point in life. It is more frequent in women than men and peaks around the third decade. The most current global data confirms its scale:
619 M
People worldwide with low back pain · GBD 2021
#1
Leading cause of years lived with disability globally
$134.5 B
U.S. healthcare spending · Dieleman 2020
In 2016, low back and neck pain were responsible for the highest healthcare expenditures of any of 154 conditions analyzed in the United States — $134.5 billion, more than diabetes ($111.2B) or ischemic heart disease ($89.3B). Globally, low back pain is projected to affect more than 800 million people by 2050. The point isn't to alarm you — it's to make clear that this is one of the most underestimated public health problems of our time.
Five main risk factors
Age. Risk increases progressively with age; peak burden around 85 years according to GBD 2021.
Psychosocial factors — chronic stress, anxiety, depression. The mind and the back are more connected than most patients realize.
Low job satisfaction — a documented and consistent risk factor in the literature, sometimes underestimated.
Occupational factors. Jobs involving heavy lifting and jobs that require prolonged sitting both alter normal spinal biomechanics.
Overweight and obesity. Modifiable, evidence-based, and one of the most actionable risk factors you have control over.
Smoking is also a well-established risk factor for chronic back pain. The good news: at least three of these five are modifiable — psychosocial factors, occupational factors and weight. Working on those is rarely glamorous, but it's the highest-leverage thing most patients can do.
Even though most cases of low back pain resolve on their own, about 10% have a cause that should be investigated. The definitive diagnosis is established by your physician, but you should already know the so-called red flags — clinical clues that warrant specialist evaluation.
9 red flags · See a specialist if you have any
History of fall or trauma. Even if the impact seemed minor at the time, a fracture can be missed without imaging.
Prior cancer, osteoporosis, or diabetes. Even resolved cancer changes how back pain is evaluated — metastatic disease to the spine is a documented possibility.
Pain that wakes you at night. Mechanical back pain usually eases with rest. Pain that interrupts sleep is not characteristic of the benign pattern.
No improvement after 4–6 weeks of physical therapy, rest, or directed exercise. Time is the best therapeutic test — if pain hasn't budged, it's time for a more careful look.
Unintentional weight loss. If you haven't been dieting or exercising and you've lost weight, the back pain may be part of a larger picture.
Back pain with fever of unknown origin, especially with recurrent urinary infections. Suggests possible spinal infection or discitis.
Leg numbness or weakness. A 'leg going to sleep' or inability to walk because of weakness or pain is never normal. It points to nerve involvement.
Loss of bladder or bowel control. This is a medical emergency — possible cauda equina syndrome. Go to the emergency department today, not next week.
Over 50 years old with new or worsening back pain. After 50, your spine has aged — and back pain in this group cannot be brushed off as 'just muscular' without evaluation.
Of these nine flags, flag #8 (loss of sphincter control) is the only one that is a medical emergency — go to the emergency department immediately, not your primary care physician next week. The other eight warrant prompt — within days to a couple of weeks — specialist evaluation, not urgent. Knowing the difference can save your nerves, sometimes literally.
Why flag #8 is an emergency · Recent data
Cauda equina syndrome: the clinical fingerprint
A 2023 study analyzing 256 patients with suspected cauda equina syndrome (mean age 58 years) identified the clinical features most strongly associated with MRI-confirmed disease. The numbers explain why this is the one red flag where you cannot wait:
OR 14.97
Neurological deficit → MRI-proven CES
OR 10.62
Loss of sensation of rectal fullness → MRI-proven CES
35%
Patients presented with urinary or fecal incontinence
22%
Predominant symptom was bilateral sciatica
What to watch for: bilateral sciatica (both legs at once), urinary or fecal incontinence, loss of the sensation that you need to defecate, and saddle-area numbness. The combination of bilateral leg symptoms plus any sphincter or perineal symptom is a medical emergency. Early diagnosis and surgical decompression — usually within hours — are the only proven way to preserve neurological function.
Zeb J et al., SICOT-J 2023 · n=256 · ref. 11
Nerves are very sensitive structures that don't always fully recover their function once damaged. The damage can be progressive, and pain can always get worse than it is right now. There are activities that exacerbate symptoms and worsen your back condition — and there are therapies that improve them. Only a specialist can tell you which is which for your case.
There are also causes of low back pain that require surgery. The most common are lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, and vertebral fractures. The current evidence base — including the latest NICE guidelines (2020) — emphasizes stratified care: not every patient with back pain needs imaging, and not every imaging finding requires surgery. But the patients who do need investigation benefit enormously from being identified early.
When is imaging actually needed? Recent radiology evidence is clear: imaging studies are usually indicated when symptoms persist beyond 6 weeks of conservative care, or when any red flag is present. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for evaluating the lumbar spine in chronic low back pain — it gives the best view of the disc, spinal cord, and nerve roots without radiation. CT has its place (better for bony detail and fractures), and X-rays are useful for alignment and instability, but MRI is the test that most often changes treatment decisions. Imaging done too early — before 6 weeks of symptoms in a patient without red flags — frequently shows incidental findings that don't explain the pain and may lead to unnecessary interventions.
The bottom line
Back pain is not normal — but it is common, and most of it gets better. Your job is to recognize when your case is not part of the 90% that resolves on its own. The 9 red flags above are the simplest screening tool available. If even one of them applies to you, see a spine specialist.
Final reflection
The hardest part of being a spine surgeon isn't the operating room — it's seeing patients arrive too late. Patients who waited because they thought back pain was 'normal,' because someone told them to 'just rest,' because they didn't recognize their own red flags. Most of those people would have done better with earlier evaluation — sometimes avoiding surgery altogether through directed conservative care, sometimes preserving neurological function that's irreversible once lost.
If your back has been hurting and you weren't sure if it was 'serious enough' — that uncertainty is itself a reason to come in. The back pain you've learned to live with may be more serious than you think.
Thank you for reading.
Dr. Rodrigo Ávila Cervantes
Spine Neurosurgeon · FAANS · FCNS · CICOVE Director
No single manoeuvre settles the question. The straight leg raise test is very good at one thing: when it is negative, a herniated disc compressing a nerve root becomes unlikely. A positive result says much less — many people with a positive test turn out not to have a herniation (van der Windt et al., 2010; Capra et al., 2011).
The neurological examination — strength, reflexes, sensation — behaves the opposite way. Individual findings miss a good number of real cases, but when clearly abnormal they carry weight (Al Nezari et al., 2013; Tawa et al., 2017). Working out which level is affected from the examination alone is less reliable still: the classic dermatome maps hold less consistently than textbooks suggest (Hancock et al., 2011; Taylor et al., 2013).
What you describe matters as much as the manoeuvres. Pain that clearly worsens with coughing, sneezing or straining — and precisely where it worsens — is among the more useful clues to nerve root compression (Verwoerd et al., 2014; Verwoerd et al., 2016; Vroomen et al., 1999; Vroomen et al., 2002; Deyo et al., 1992).
One more reason for caution: the examination is itself vulnerable to bias, because whoever examines you already knows your story and expects a particular result (Suri et al., 2010). That is why a sound consultation combines history, examination and — only when warranted — imaging, and why no single element should decide an operation on its own.
In most cases, not at the beginning. For low back pain without red flags, routine imaging does not improve pain, function or recovery — and it does raise the likelihood of ending up in an operating room (Chou et al., 2009; Jarvik et al., 2003; Kendrick et al., 2001).
Imaging earns its place in three situations: when there are red flags, when radicular symptoms persist or progress after several weeks of properly conducted treatment, and when a procedure is genuinely being considered (Kreiner et al., 2014; Jarvik y Deyo, 2002; Lurie, 2005; Kaito y Yamato, 2022).
The order matters. The study is requested to answer a question the consultation already framed — not to go looking for one. When MRIs are ordered without that filter, a large share come back with findings that do not explain the pain the patient came in with (de Schepper et al., 2016).
Not on its own. Disc degeneration, bulges and even herniations show up routinely in people with no pain whatsoever (Kanayama et al., 2009; Boden, 1996; Haig et al., 2006). A finding only becomes relevant when it explains the symptoms you actually have.
Interpretation also varies more than most patients imagine. Different radiologists — and the same radiologist on different days — do not always grade the same nerve root compression the same way (Kim et al., 2009; Pfirrmann et al., 2004; El Barzouhi et al., 2013).
And the image is a poor predictor of the future: how the MRI looks at the start correlates weakly with how the patient will actually do (Modic et al., 2005). Taken as a whole, the diagnostic accuracy of imaging for disc herniation is less firmly established than it appears (Wassenaar et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2018).
MRI is the first choice when the problem involves a nerve root: it shows disc, nerve and soft tissue without radiation. CT reads bone better — fracture, bone quality, anatomy before placing instrumentation — and complements rather than replaces it (van Rijn et al., 2012).
CT-myelography retains a specific role: when an MRI cannot be performed or cannot be read — a pacemaker, or heavy artefact from hardware implanted in a previous operation. In revision cases that scenario is not rare (Bischoff et al., 1993; Jackson et al., 1989; Park et al., 2017; Pomerantz, 2011).
It is an invasive study and is not requested casually. Distinguishing a contained herniation from a non-contained one — a difference that changes which treatments can be offered — is one of the details where the choice of study genuinely matters (Oh et al., 2013).
Most radicular pain improves without surgery. Guidelines converge on a period of well-conducted conservative treatment before an operation is considered, and how long that period should reasonably be depends on the type of herniation (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Kreiner et al., 2014; Latka et al., 2016; Sakai, 2022; Deyo et al., 1990).
There are two exceptions where waiting does harm. Cauda equina syndrome — loss of bladder or bowel control, saddle numbness — is a surgical emergency, and delay is associated with worse recovery of urinary function (DeLong et al., 2008). A motor deficit that is getting worse is the second.
Outside those two, time is usually on your side. What should not be spent is time on a treatment that is not working while a deficit advances.
Not all of them. Paracetamol, for years the default first step, performed no better than placebo for acute low back pain in a large randomised trial (Williams et al., 2014).
When the pain has a clear neuropathic component, duloxetine has controlled-trial support (Schukro et al., 2016). Epidural steroid injections can relieve radicular pain in selected patients, with an ongoing debate about which route works best and how long the effect lasts (Manchikanti et al., 2014; Manchikanti et al., 2015).
Chemonucleolysis with condoliase sits between conservative treatment and surgery and has randomised support, but its availability varies by country — it is not an option everywhere (Chiba et al., 2018). And when surgery is indicated, removing only the fragment versus the fragment plus disc material has shown comparable results in comparative studies (Ran et al., 2015).
The content of this article is drawn from the following peer-reviewed sources, including post-2020 global burden of disease data, current clinical practice guidelines, recent cauda equina syndrome data, and primary-care sciatica management literature.
Patrick, N., Emanski, E., & Knaub, M. A. (2016). Acute and chronic low back pain. Medical Clinics of North America, 100(1), 169–181.
Golob, A. L., & Wipf, J. E. (2014). Low back pain. Medical Clinics of North America, 98(3), 405–428.
Pengel, L. H., Herbert, R. D., Maher, C. G., & Refshauge, K. M. (2003). Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ, 327(7410), 323.
Luo, X., Pietrobon, R., Sun, S. X., Liu, G. G., & Hey, L. (2004). Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine, 29(1), 79–86.
Linton, S. J. (2000). A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine, 25(9), 1148–1156.
Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N., Bongers, P. M., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (2000). Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine, 25(16), 2114–2125.
Matsui, H., Maeda, A., Tsuji, H., & Naruse, Y. (1997). Risk indicators of low back pain among workers in Japan: association of familial and physical factors with low back pain. Spine, 22(11), 1242–1247.
Dieleman, J. L., Cao, J., Chapin, A., Chen, C., Li, Z., Liu, A., Horst, C., Kaldjian, A., Matyasz, T., Scott, K. W., Bui, A. L., Campbell, M., Duber, H. C., Dunn, A. C., Flaxman, A. D., Fitzmaurice, C., Naghavi, M., Sadat, N., Shieh, P., Squires, E., Yeung, K., & Murray, C. J. L. (2020). US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. JAMA, 323(9), 863–884.
GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators (Ferreira, M. L., de Luca, K., Haile, L. M., et al.). (2023). Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Rheumatology, 5(6), e316–e329.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. NICE guideline [NG59]. Published 2016, last updated December 2020. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59
Zeb, J., Zaib, J., Khan, A., Farid, M., Ambreen, S., & Shah, S. H. (2023). Characteristics and clinical features of cauda equina syndrome: insights from a study on 256 patients. SICOT-J, 9, 22.
Aguilar-Shea, A. L., Gallardo-Mayo, C., Sanz-González, R., & Paredes, I. (2022). Sciatica. Management for family physicians. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(8), 4174–4179.
Martel Villagrán, J., Martínez-Sánchez, R. T., Cebada-Chaparro, E., Bueno Horcajadas, A. L., & Pérez-Fernández, E. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of lumbar CT and MRI in the evaluation of chronic low back pain without red flag symptoms. Radiología (English Edition), 65(Suppl 2), S59–S70.
van der Windt, D. A., Simons, E., Riphagen, I. I., Ammendolia, C., Verhagen, A. P., Laslett, M., Devillé, W., Deyo, R. A., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Aertgeerts, B. (2010). Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD007431.
Capra, F., Vanti, C., Donati, R., Tombetti, S., O'Reilly, C., & Pillastrini, P. (2011). Validity of the straight-leg raise test for patients with sciatic pain with or without lumbar pain using magnetic resonance imaging results as a reference standard. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 34(4), 231–238.
Al Nezari, N. H., Schneiders, A. G., & Hendrick, P. A. (2013). Neurological examination of the peripheral nervous system to diagnose lumbar spinal disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Spine Journal, 13(6), 657–674.
Tawa, N., Rhoda, A., & Diener, I. (2017). Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 93.
Hancock, M. J., Koes, B., Ostelo, R., & Peul, W. (2011). Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination in identifying the level of herniation in patients with sciatica. Spine, 36(11), E712–E719.
Taylor, C. S., Coxon, A. J., Watson, P. C., & Greenough, C. G. (2013). Do L5 and S1 nerve root compressions produce radicular pain in a dermatomal pattern? Spine, 38(12), 995–998.
Verwoerd, A. J., Peul, W. C., Willemsen, S. P., Koes, B. W., Vleggeert-Lankamp, C. L., el Barzouhi, A., Luijsterburg, P. A., & Verhagen, A. P. (2014). Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression. The Spine Journal, 14(9), 2028–2037.
Verwoerd, A. J. H., Mens, J., el Barzouhi, A., Peul, W. C., Koes, B. W., & Verhagen, A. P. (2016). A diagnostic study in patients with sciatica establishing the importance of localization of worsening of pain during coughing, sneezing and straining to assess nerve root compression on MRI. European Spine Journal, 25(5), 1389–1392.
Vroomen, P. C., de Krom, M. C., & Knottnerus, J. A. (1999). Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: a systematic review. Journal of Neurology, 246(10), 899–906.
Vroomen, P. C., de Krom, M. C., Wilmink, J. T., Kester, A. D., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2002). Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72(5), 630–634.
Deyo, R. A., Rainville, J., & Kent, D. L. (1992). What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA, 268(6), 760–765.
Suri, P., Hunter, D. J., Katz, J. N., Li, L., & Rainville, J. (2010). Bias in the physical examination of patients with lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 275.
Chou, R., Fu, R., Carrino, J. A., & Deyo, R. A. (2009). Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 373(9662), 463–472.
Jarvik, J. G., Hollingworth, W., Martin, B., Emerson, S. S., Gray, D. T., Overman, S., Robinson, D., Staiger, T., Wessbecher, F., Sullivan, S. D., Kreuter, W., & Deyo, R. A. (2003). Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 289(21), 2810–2818.
Kendrick, D., Fielding, K., Bentley, E., Kerslake, R., Miller, P., & Pringle, M. (2001). Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 322(7283), 400–405.
Jarvik, J. G., & Deyo, R. A. (2002). Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(7), 586–597.
Kreiner, D. S., Hwang, S. W., Easa, J. E., Resnick, D. K., Baisden, J. L., Bess, S., Cho, C. H., DePalma, M. J., Dougherty, P., Fernand, R., Ghiselli, G., Hanna, A. S., Lamer, T., Lisi, A. J., Mazanec, D. J., Meagher, R. J., Nucci, R. C., Patel, R. D., Sembrano, J. N., … Toton, J. F. (2014). An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The Spine Journal, 14(1), 180–191.
Lurie, J. D. (2005). What diagnostic tests are useful for low back pain? Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 19(4), 557–575.
de Schepper, E. I., Koes, B. W., Veldhuizen, E. F., Oei, E. H., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M., & Luijsterburg, P. A. (2016). Prevalence of spinal pathology in patients presenting for lumbar MRI as referred from general practice. Family Practice, 33(1), 51–56.
Kaito, T., & Yamato, Y. (2022). The essence of clinical practice guidelines for lumbar disc herniation, 2021: 3. Diagnosis. Spine Surgery and Related Research, 6(4), 325–328.
Kanayama, M., Togawa, D., Takahashi, C., Terai, T., & Hashimoto, T. (2009). Cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of lumbar disc degeneration in 200 healthy individuals. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 11(4), 501–507.
Boden, S. D. (1996). The use of radiographic imaging studies in the evaluation of patients who have degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 78(1), 114–124.
Haig, A. J., Tong, H. C., & Yamakawa, K. S. (2006). Spinal stenosis, back pain, or no symptoms at all? A masked study comparing radiologic and electrodiagnostic diagnoses to the clinical impression. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(7), 897–903.
Kim, S. W., Yeom, J. S., Park, S. K., Chang, B. S., Lee, C. K., & Riew, K. D. (2009). Inter- and intra-observer reliability of MRI for lumbar lateral disc herniation. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 1(1), 34–39.
Pfirrmann, C. W. A., Dora, C., Schmid, M. R., Zanetti, M., Hodler, J., & Boos, N. (2004). MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology, 230(2), 583–588.
El Barzouhi, A., Vleggeert-Lankamp, C. L., Lycklama à Nijeholt, G. J., Van der Kallen, B. F., van den Hout, W. B., Koes, B. W., & Peul, W. C. (2013). Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery. PLoS One, 8(7), e68411.
Modic, M. T., Obuchowski, N. A., Ross, J. S., Brant-Zawadzki, M. N., Grooff, P. N., Mazanec, D. J., & Benzel, E. C. (2005). Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome. Radiology, 237(2), 597–604.
Wassenaar, M., van Rijn, R. M., van Tulder, M. W., Verhagen, A. P., van der Windt, D. A., Koes, B. W., de Boer, M. R., Ginai, A. Z., & Ostelo, R. W. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. European Spine Journal, 21(2), 220–227.
Kim, J. H., van Rijn, R. M., van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B. W., de Boer, M. R., Ginai, A. Z., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., & Verhagen, A. P. (2018). Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic imaging for lumbar disc herniation in adults with low back pain or sciatica is unknown: a systematic review. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 26, 37.
van Rijn, R. M., Wassenaar, M., Verhagen, A. P., Ostelo, R. W., Ginai, A. Z., de Boer, M. R., van Tulder, M. W., & Koes, B. W. (2012). Computed tomography for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. European Spine Journal, 21(2), 228–239.
Bischoff, R. J., Rodriguez, R. P., Gupta, K., Righi, A., Dalton, J. E., & Whitecloud, T. S. (1993). A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 6(4), 289–295.
Jackson, R. P., Cain, J. E., Jacobs, R. R., Cooper, B. R., & McManus, G. E. (1989). The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: II. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine, 14(12), 1362–1367.
Park, C. K., Lee, H. J., & Ryu, K. S. (2017). Comparison of root images between post-myelographic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 60(5), 540–549.
Pomerantz, S. R. (2011). Myelography: modern technique and indications. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 135, 193–208.
Oh, K. J., Lee, J. W., Yun, B. L., Kwon, S. T., Park, K. W., Yeom, J. S., & Kang, H. S. (2013). Comparison of MR imaging findings between extraligamentous and subligamentous disk herniations in the lumbar spine. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(3), 683–687.
Nakagawa, H., Kamimura, M., Takahara, K., Hashidate, H., Kawaguchi, A., Uchiyama, S., & Miyasaka, T. (2007). Optimal duration of conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation depending on the type of herniation. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 14(2), 104–109.
Latka, D., Miekisiak, G., Jarmuzek, P., Lachowski, M., & Kaczmarczyk, J. (2016). Treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Clinical practice guidelines endorsed by the Polish Society of Spinal Surgery. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska, 50(2), 101–108.
Sakai, D. (2022). The essence of clinical practice guidelines for lumbar disc herniation, 2021: 4. Treatment. Spine Surgery and Related Research, 6(4), 329–332.
Deyo, R. A., Loeser, J. D., & Bigos, S. J. (1990). Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. Annals of Internal Medicine, 112(8), 598–603.
DeLong, W. B., Polissar, N., & Neradilek, B. (2008). Timing of surgery in cauda equina syndrome with urinary retention: meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 8(4), 305–320.
Williams, C. M., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., McLachlan, A. J., Hancock, M. J., Day, R. O., & Lin, C. W. (2014). Efficacy of paracetamol for acute low-back pain: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 384(9954), 1586–1596.
Schukro, R. P., Oehmke, M. J., Geroldinger, A., Heinze, G., Kress, H. G., & Pramhas, S. (2016). Efficacy of duloxetine in chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Anesthesiology, 124(1), 150–158.
Manchikanti, L., Cash, K. A., Pampati, V., & Falco, F. J. (2014). Transforaminal epidural injections in chronic lumbar disc herniation: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial. Pain Physician, 17(4), E489–E501.
Manchikanti, L., Singh, V., Pampati, V., Falco, F. J., & Hirsch, J. A. (2015). Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other? The Korean Journal of Pain, 28(1), 11–21.
Chiba, K., Matsuyama, Y., Seo, T., & Toyama, Y. (2018). Condoliase for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial. Spine, 43(15), E869–E876.
Ran, J., Hu, Y., Zheng, Z., Zhu, T., Zheng, H., Jing, Y., Xu, K., Yi, C., & Zhou, W. (2015). Comparison of discectomy versus sequestrectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121816.